Related Articles
A postal worker who was illegally docked more than £4,000 of sick pay by a manager she previously accused of bullying has won back her money after taking bosses to a tribunal.
Pamela Gray signed off work, citing stress and anxiety, after discovering that her new boss at Bo’ness Delivery Office would be a colleague she had once accused of bullying.
She told the soon-to-be-leaving manager that she couldn’t work with her new colleague and handed in a long-term sick note from her doctor.
READ MORE: Scottish schoolboy thought he was ‘going do die’ after terrifying park attack
She then told her new boss in a letter: “You and everyone else are well aware that I am off work because of previous issues with yourself.
“Make no mistake, I want to be working at this time, I hope my sick line from the doctor will do.”
However her new supervisor demanded that she meet with him or face having her pay docked, reports the Daily Record
When both Ms Gray and a trade union rep failed to show, he said in a letter dated April 12th: “I must advise you that from 13 04 2021 you will no longer be entitled to receive Royal Mail sick pay.”
An Employment Tribunal has now concluded that the Royal Mail illegally deducted £3,893.21 of wages from Pamela’s wages between April and September 2021 after she concluded she couldn’t face her alleged tormentor.
Get all the latest news and headlines from Edinburgh, Fife and the Lothians sent straight to your inbox twice a day by signing up to our free newsletter.
From breaking news to the latest on the coronavirus crisis in Scotland, we’ll have you covered.
The morning newsletter arrives every day before 9am and the evening newsletter, manually curated by the team, is sent at 6.30pm, giving you a round up of the most important stories of the day.
To sign up, simply enter your email address into this link here and select Daily News.
She is still employed at the sorting office on East Pier Street in Bo’ness, between Grangemouth and South Queensferry.
A Royal Mail spokesperson said: “We’re reviewing the judgement and will take on board any lessons learned.”
Employment Judge Joseph d’Inverno said that the deductions had begun with too little notice – one day – and that a failure by her trade union rep to appear at meetings on her behalf couldn’t be blamed on her.
He also said postal bosses couldn’t use the fact she was continuing to work elsewhere in the sorting office as a cleaner against her.
Pamela’s manager in that job – under a separate company – had rearranged her rota to make sure she never came face-to-face with her accused bully.
The judge also criticised the Royal Mail for failing to give her the option of speaking to someone else inside the postal giant.
It had insisted that everything had to go through the manager she said she was “physically and mentally unable” to work alongside despite the issues she had raised.
And at one point early in the dispute, another Royal Mail boss said to Pamela of her allegations: “It didn’t happen, it didn’t happen.”
Judge d’Inverno said: “The decision [to stop sick pay] and the reasons notified…were predicated upon a number of factual inaccuracies.
“The Tribunal determined that the claimant’s [Pamela’s] entitlement to sick pay continued…and that in withholding the claimant’s sick pay in that period the respondent [RM] did make an unauthorised deduction from her wages.”
Pamela, who secured the victory against her employers without legal representation, told a Record reporter she was unable to comment.
