Communication Workers Union mass meeting paves way for rotten sellout

Thursday night’s online mass meeting called by the Communication Workers Union (CWU) to “update” members on the Royal Mail dispute was an insult to tens of thousands of postal workers in Britain engaged in a determined eight-month fight to defend their livelihoods.

CWU bureaucrats claimed a deal could be reached “within days”, concealing the content of their extensive talks with Royal Mail executives beneath a deluge of empty verbiage.

CWU officials called the meeting to stem mounting anger over the union’s refusal to call strikes to defeat Royal Mail’s escalating attacks. In the early hours of Wednesday morning, Royal Mail executives announced company-union talks were over, unveiling a provocative “final offer” that builds on draconian workplace revisions imposed unilaterally in recent months with the complicity of the CWU.

Royal Mail has not given an inch. In place of its 9 percent “best and final” 18-month pay offer in November, which incorporated 2 percent imposed unilaterally last year, Royal Mail announced Wednesday a revised 10 percent offer over three years, with a one-off lump sum of £500 or £1,500 depending on the rate at which instalments are paid.

This pittance is tied to revised start times, pushing back shifts, with letter deliveries ending at 4.30pm. The company presents this as an act of generosity, with duties beginning 60-90 minutes later, starting from March 2024, “instead of our original proposal for everyone of 3 hours”. All of this is part of Royal Mail’s transformation into a parcel delivery service, gutting the Universal Service Obligation for letter delivery.

Royal Mail’s “offer” would also entrench a two-tier workforce, with new entrants on inferior terms. Sunday working will remain voluntary and at premium rates for existing staff only. On job protection, it commits only to no “compulsory” redundancies. But hiking up exploitation through workplace revisions is already forcing out senior staff who are less physically able to withstand punishing workloads.

Despite Royal Mail’s bonfire of pay, terms and conditions, Furey reported the union’s postal executive had met on Wednesday and concluded, “it would be wrong at this juncture to take [strike] action when we are making progress.” Ward weighed in, attacking those who call for strikes “every other minute”, and declaring pompously, “At this point in time, we don’t believe that’s the right thing to do.”

All input and control by the membership was excluded. Dozens of postal workers posted messages in the meeting livestream, demanding industrial action, many invoking the overwhelming strike mandate delivered by members in February. But Webb assumed the role of self-appointed “spokesman” for the membership, selecting which questions to ask Ward and Furey, and attacking those who criticised senior officials.

Ominously, a central refrain was the need to “accept change” (a euphemism for pro-market restructuring). Ward stated, “Change was always a necessity in how we take this forward, and it always will be”. The Royal Mail dispute was “a Wapping moment” and a “miners’ dispute moment”, he declared, citing the 1984-85 miners’ strike and 1986-87 battle of Fleet Street printers against Rupert Murdoch’s News International, concluding, “The industry has got to change. And we believe that there is a way of making change happen. That it can help this company move forward, make it successful again, and that you can share in all the benefits of that.”

From these two most important industrial battles of the past forty years, Ward drew the conclusion that no serious fight must ever again be mounted against the employers. Instead change must be imposed by the unions themselves.

What will this mean for postal workers? In the 1980s, “change” was enforced against printers and miners via state repression, including the mass arrest and jailing of strikers, with the Trades Union Congress refusing to lift a finger in their defence. The outcome was the destruction of tens of thousands of jobs and the decimation of both industries. Ward now declares that a similar “success” at Royal Mail will be achieved via a pro-company agreement with the CWU that will supposedly “trickle down” to workers.

Ward and Furey spoke not as union leaders defending their members, but as management consultants lecturing on the inevitability of workplace reform and the desirability of industrial harmony, “We would love to work together with the management team. We would love to work together with you and turn the fortunes of this company around. That’s our objective and what we need is an agreement that does that.”

As the meeting progressed, angry comments from postal workers mounted. Ward’s references to Royal Mail’s “serious financial position”, “difficult economic conditions” and “pressures” drew ridicule and rebuke from poorly-paid workers. “RM are skint but still pay their management bonuses. Stop buying the company rhetoric, call the strike dates”, wrote one postal worker, while another commented, “Sadly you’ve now bought into the company are in dire financial straits policy to accept a poor deal.”