Home / Royal Mail / Coronavirus UK: Death toll rises by 40 to 177 with 3,355 cases

Coronavirus UK: Death toll rises by 40 to 177 with 3,355 cases

Britain’s coronavirus death toll today jumped by 40 in the biggest daily spike yet, with 177 lives now lost to the killer infection that is rapidly spreading across the UK. 

Health chiefs also announced 714 more Britons tested positive for the life-threatening illness, taking the country’s infection toll to almost 4,000. 

It comes as Boris Johnson tonight ordered all pubs, bars, restaurants to shut down tonight in a dramatic lockdown to slow the spread of the ever-growing coronavirus crisis.

NHS England announced 39 patients had died overnight, with the oldest victim a 99-year-old. Eighteen of the new deaths were recorded in London – the centre of Britain’s escalating outbreak.

Wales also recorded its third fatality today. Scotland has had six coronavirus deaths, while Northern Ireland has only had one so far.  

Some 3,983 patients have been struck down in the UK already, but the true size of Britain’s outbreak is currently being masked because authorities have decided to only test patients in hospital.

Officials fear up to 180,000 people may have already caught the virus, with experts estimating there are 1,000 cases for every one death.

Paramedics, ambulance and crew in a residential street in Southend-on-Sea respond to a suspected coronavirus case on Friday as the country reported its biggest spike in deaths since the outbreak began

Paramedics, ambulance and crew in a residential street in Southend-on-Sea respond to a suspected coronavirus case on Friday as the country reported its biggest spike in deaths since the outbreak began

The spike in fatalities comes as:

  • Boris’ coronavirus strategy could fail and leave the NHS on the brink unless at least half the public obey self-isolation and ‘social distancing’ rules, Number 10’s own experts have warned.
  • Brits are threatening to boycott JD Wetherspoon today after its chairman refused to shut pubs and claimed there have been ‘no transmissions of coronavirus in bars’
  • The UK firm behind a cheap DIY coronavirus test which is ’98 per cent accurate’ claims its offer to mass produce them for the NHS has fallen on deaf ears
  • The NHS will write to 1.4 million vulnerable Britons to tell them to self-isolate and not leave their homes from Monday
  • Furious Britons are lashing out at selfish panic-buyers who are raiding shelves and leaving those most in need without food and essential supplies 
  • Scientists say diarrhoea and loss of appetite could be early signs of coronavirus after studies show almost half of patients experience one or more digestive symptoms 
  • Teachers could be forced work through the Easter holidays and at weekends to care for the children of coronavirus key workers after the ‘majority’ of parents asked for school spaces through the crisis

The 18 fresh deaths in London come as the Prime Minister mulls a decision to putt the capital on lockdown tonight in a move that would see pubs, restaurants and other social centres across London finally ordered to close.

The city and its nine-million population is ahead of the curve on coronavirus infections, according to scientists, but social media has been awash with pictures showing bars bursting at the seams with people seemingly indifferent to the risk. 

There was widespread furious criticism of Tim Martin, the multi-millionaire Wetherspoon boss, for saying he intended to help people ignoring expert advice to self-isolate at home as much as possible by keeping his chain open.

Other venues that could be subjected to closure orders from authorities include any cinemas and gyms that have yet to shut their doors to customers.

It came as experts warned today that Boris Johnson’s coronavirus plan could fail and leave the NHS on the brink unless at least half the public obey self-isolation and ‘social distancing’ rules.

No10 sources cautioned that a final decision on compulsory shutdowns has not been taken, saying ‘we’re not there just yet’.

The JJ Moon's in Tooting, south London, was packed with punters at lunchtime today

The JJ Moon’s in Tooting, south London, was packed with punters at lunchtime today 

Coronavirus strategy could FAIL and leave the NHS on the brink unless half of Britons obey ‘social distancing’

 Boris Johnson’s coronavirus plan could fail and leave the NHS on the brink unless at least half the public obey self-isolation and ‘social distancing’ rules, the government’s own experts have warned.

A swathe of newly-released evidence presented to ministers suggests that the fate of the PM’s plan rests on convincing enough people to fall into line.

One paper from the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) dated March 9 says it might be ‘unachievable’ to get 50 per cent of the population to follow measures – including urging everyone to avoid all non-essential social contact and households isolating when one person has symptoms. 

It cautions that if the level falls far below that there could be limited effect in protecting the NHS from being overwhelmed. 

The documents will increase the pressure on the PM to force bars and pubs to close, saying they are ‘higher risk’ that public events, most of which have already been cancelled. 

The experts also cast significant doubt on Mr Johnson’s claim that the ‘tide can be turned’ in the crisis within 12 weeks, saying restrictions will be needed for ‘at least most of a year’.

It suggests that Britain will be split into different zones, with ‘hotspots’ such as London and the Midlands facing tougher measures.

Controls could also be eased and tightened depending on the speed of spread, as ministers try to avoid a flurry of cases breaking capacity in the health service.

These would need to be in place for at least most of a year. Under such as policy, at least half of the year would be spent under the stricter social distancing measures. 

But they did not rule out an announcement at the Prime Minister’s daily press conference tonight. London Mayor Sadiq Khan is also understood to be expecting a significant move this evening, but has not been given details yet.

Mr Khan earlier hit out at people who continue to go to pubs and use public transport, warning he will ‘infringe’ their human rights if necessary.

He threatened to ban people from going to the pub and cafés himself in a stark address to the London Assembly last night.

It came after Mr Johnson was earlier slammed for ‘sending confusing messages which cost lives’.

He has for days urged people to stay away from pubs – but No 10 this morning failed to criticise the Wetherspoon chairman for refusing to close his bars during the coronavirus crisis.

The Conservative Party donor and boozer chain figurehead sparked fury this morning as he said closing pubs was ‘over the top’ despite warnings from the government’s chief scientific adviser that bars are a breeding ground for the deadly virus.

Mr Martin told the BBC that a ‘sensible balance’ was for pubs to implement ‘social distancing’ measures, like no standing at the bar, using cards and sitting at separate tables.

He sparked further outrage as he told Sky that ‘supermarkets posed more of a danger than pubs’.

In response to Mr Martin’s comments, the Prime Minister’s deputy official spokesman simply said the government has, ‘been clear about the importance of social distancing’.

Asked if he was nervous about criticising political supporters of Boris Johnson, the spokesman said: ‘We’ve based all our decisions on the best scientific evidence and we will continue to do so.’

The PM this week was met with anger from the hospitality industry as he told people not to visit pubs, clubs and cafes – but stopped short of closing them, meaning venues are losing footfall and cannot claim insurance.

Meanwhile, foolhardy revellers continue to flock to pubs and clubs across the country as they ignore calls urging social distancing to prevent the spread of the disease.

Mr Martin told Sky: ‘Supermarkets are very, very crowded. Pubs are much less crowded. There’s hardly been any transmission of the virus within pubs and I think it’s over the top to shut them. ‘That’s a commercial view but also a common sense view.’

Startling new data released on Wednesday night shows 29 percent of the first 2,500 cases of coronavirus in America were people between the ages of 20 and 44.

Of that number, 20 percent were hospitalised and 12 percent put in intensive care units. Some 55 percent of the cases were all under the age of 65.

People have been criticised for ignoring social distancing guidelines, including these drinkers in Leeds

People have been criticised for ignoring social distancing guidelines, including these drinkers in Leeds  

BORIS JOHNSON SAYS BRITAIN ‘CAN TURN THE TIDE ON CORONAVIRUS’  

Boris Johnson insisted Britain can 'turn the tide' on coronavirus

Boris Johnson insisted Britain can ‘turn the tide’ on coronavirus

Boris Johnson yesterday insisted Britain can ‘turn the tide’ on coronavirus within 12 weeks – but issued a stark plea for Londoners to be stricter in obeying the advice on ‘social isolation’.

The PM said he knew how much was being asked of the public as he insisted he was confident the outbreak can be ‘sent packing’.

He said it was ‘absolutely vital’ to follow guidance on staying out of bars and cafes, and avoiding unnecessary contact.

But he warned that obedience of the rules was ‘patchy’ in some part of London, hinting that there will need to be a tougher crackdown soon – although he stressed it would not be a total lockdown.

‘It is vital that people follow that advice and there is huge evidence that they are,’ Mr Johnson said.

‘But (there is) some evidence that in some parts of the capital it is very patchy and some areas where perhaps people aren’t following it in quite the way we need them to.

‘We may have to consider going further.’

Mr Johnson also suggested he wanted to ramp up testing massively. After promising to increase the daily rate from around 5,000 to 25,000, he has now said that figure coudl rise to 250,000.

‘We are massively increasing the testing to see whether you have it now, and ramping up daily testing from 5,000 a day, to 10,000 to 25,000 and then up at 250,000,’ he said.

Mr Johnson said the UK was ready to buy hundreds of thousands of kits for an antibody test that would reveal who had been through the virus and had a level of immunity.

And he said the first UK patient was going through a randomised trial of a drug to treat coronavirus. 

There are growing fears that the capital is driving the spread of the outbreak, with around a third of total infections detected there and many more in the commuter belt bordering the city.

The government has insisted London will not be completely cut off from the rest of the country, with ‘zero’ prospect’ of trains in and out of the capital being axed, and ‘no plans’ to shut down the Tube system entirely, although services have been pared back.

Social media users have criticised Mr Martin’s ‘grossly irresponsible’ stance and for ‘putting money before health’.

The hashtag, ‘#BoycottWetherspoons’ is now trending on Twitter.

Many have urged him to use his platform in the same way as celebrities including Kylie Jenner, who has encouraged youngsters to stay at home.

Labour MP David Lammy tweeted: ‘Yesterday the government’s Chief Scientific Adviser said ‘mixing in pubs and restaurants needs to stop’.

‘Today the government is refusing to condemn Weatherspoon’s owner Tim Martin for suggesting the opposite. Confusing messages will cost lives. Pubs and restaurants must close.’

Mr Martin today said falling sales at the chain have dropped further after Prime Minister Boris Johnson told punters to stay at home and not visit Britain’s pubs.

The pub chain said that sales, which had risen by 3.2% in the previous six weeks, started falling by 4.5% in the week ending March 15, as the coronavirus pandemic scared customers off.

The decline picked up even further when the Prime Minister told people that it was vital they do not visit pubs in order to slow the spread of the highly infectious disease.

But despite warnings from the government’s chief scientific adviser urging young people to stop going to the pub, he refused to close his bars, sparking anger among many.

He told Sky: ‘Our aim is for pubs open for the duration. This could go on for a long time. I think that once you shut them down it’s very difficult.’

Asked about Mr Martin’s decision to keep his pubs open, the Prime Minister’s deputy official spokesman said: ‘We have been clear throughout that every decision that has been made, and will be made, has been made based on the best scientific advice.

‘That will continue – we have heard the chief medical officer and chief scientific adviser talk about social distancing and we will continue to act on scientific advice.

‘We have been clear about the need for social distancing. We have asked the public to do what they have to do, and we have been clear on the reasons for doing that.’

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan said ‘liberties and human rights need to be changed, curtailed, infringed’ in order to protect people and prevent further coronavirus deaths.

He threatened to ban people from going to the pub and cafés in his stark address to the London Assembly last night.

Britain’s Chief Medical Officer, meanwhile, has warned young adults they will not ‘breeze through’ coronavirus.

Chris Whitty said: ‘It is clear that children get this disease much less strongly than adults, I think the data on that is pretty strong now, and it certainly is the case that the majority of those that end up dying sadly are people who tend to be either in the later part of their lives, usually quite elderly, or those with pre-existing health conditions.

‘But there are also some young people who have ended up in intensive care or who have ended up with severe disease around the world.

‘I think it’s important that we don’t give the impression that every single person who is young and healthy is just going to breeze through this.’

And the government’s chief scientific adviser begged young people to stop going to the pub and claims the UK cannot beat coronavirus if they keep flouting home confinement rules.

It comes as it emerged teachers could be forced work through the Easter holidays and at weekends to care for the children of coronavirus key workers after the ‘majority’ of parents asked for school spaces through the crisis, it was revealed today. 

The Government has set out its key worker definition to battle coronavirus - but many believe it is too vague and is leaving many schools and parents confused about who is eligible

The Government has set out its key worker definition to battle coronavirus – but many believe it is too vague and is leaving many schools and parents confused about who is eligible

WHAT SHOULD EVERYONE BE DOING TO STOP THE CORONAVIRUS SPREADING? 

  • Avoid social contact
  • Work from home if possible
  • Avoid pubs, clubs, theatres and other social venues
  • If someone in your household has symptoms of coronavirus (cough, fever or unusual shortness of breath), everyone in the home self-isolate for 14 days
  • If isolating, only go outside for exercise, and do it away from other people
  • Ask for help with daily necessities like food and medical supplies
  • If that is not possible – for example if you live in a remote area – you should limit social contact as much as possible
  • Vulnerable groups should self-isolate for 12 weeks from this weekend even if they have no symptoms – This includes people aged 70 and over and other adults who would normally be advised to have the flu vaccination, including people with chronic diseases such as chronic heart disease or chronic kidney disease, and pregnant women. A full list is here
  • All unnecessary visits to friends and relatives in care homes should end
  • Continue to take your children to school unless they or someone else in your home has symptoms of the coronavirus (cough, fever or unusual shortness of breath)
  • Londoners need to socially distance and work from home even more than the rest of the UK because the disease is more widespread there
  • Mass gatherings should not happen – they will no longer receive emergency services’ protection if they do go ahead 

 

Many schools and nurseries could have most of their children back in class on Monday despite being ordered to close by the Prime Minister today to stop the spread of the disease.

MailOnline readers working in schools and nurseries, which care for around 8million children in the UK, have said that parents of at least a third or more of them have claimed key worker status since the list was published last night.

But unions claim schools simply ‘cannot cope’ with the number of children set to come back next week and some headteachers have been forced to reject applications because of a lack of staff.

Some teachers today accused the Government of ‘taking the p***’ and treating them like ‘babysitters’ as they face losing their two-week Easter holiday and weekends to care for children whose parents are at work.

Dr Mary Bousted, joint general secretary of the National Education Union, said the Prime Minister’s list ‘could result in some schools having the majority of pupils attending’. She added: ‘Schools can only accommodate a limited number of children and the fewer children making the journey to school, and the fewer children in educational settings, the lower the risk that the virus can spread.’

The Department for Education has said it currently has no estimates for the number of children that need places because the situation is ‘fast moving’. But a spokesman said it expected the majority of educational establishments to stay open where required – but recognised it may be ‘impossible’ for small rural schools.

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders’ union NAHT, said: ‘Taking up a place at school during this time of wider closure is the offer of last resort, for the minority of key workers, who have no alternative’.

While Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, warned parents they must not assume Monday will be ‘business as usual’. Urging mothers and father to keep their children at home ‘if at all possible’, he said: ‘The key worker list is extensive and schools will not be able to cope with the number of children who could potentially arrive on Monday morning.

Many parents are confused about whether they qualify and are waiting anxiously to hear if their child will be in class on Monday because of the ‘vague’ policy. Some have already been rejected by headteachers who have said they do not have enough staff. 

Schools and nursery managers have said it has called ‘total chaos’ while teachers claim they will be used as ‘glorified babysitters’ because they will be expected to ‘care’ rather than ‘teach’.

Schools will now be open during the Easter holidays with some headteachers drawing up weekend rotas to care for children, especially with parents working in the NHS.  

One teacher tweeted today: ‘We are being treated as glorified babysitters’ and another wrote that schools are being ‘kept open by stealth’ and the Government is ‘taking the p***’.     

All UK schools will close by the end of the today – but headteachers and nursery managers are expected to open again on Monday for any children with parents vital to fighting coronavirus, which has killed 144 people and infected 3,269 in Britain. 

Children make their way to school with their parents today with gates due to close today - but many, if not all, will open again on Monday, it was claimed today

Children make their way to school with their parents today with gates due to close today – but many, if not all, will open again on Monday, it was claimed today

BRITS THREATEN TO BOYCOTT PUB CHAIN JD WETHERSPOON AFTER ITS CHAIRMAN REFUSED TO SHUT PUBS 

Brits are threatening to boycott JD Wetherspoon today after its chairman refused to shut pubs and claimed there have been ‘no transmissions of coronavirus in bars’.

Conservative Party donor and Wetherspoon CEO Tim Martin sparked fury as he said closing pubs was ‘over the top’ in spite of warnings from the government’s chief scientific adviser that they are a breeding ground for the virus.

Mr Martin told the BBC that a ‘sensible balance’ was for pubs to implement ‘social distancing’ measures, like no standing at the bar, using cards and sitting at separate tables.

He sparked further outrage as he told Sky that supermarkets posed more of a danger than pubs.

Mr Martin, 64, also said that he would take the opportunity to catch the coronavirus under the right conditions, adding: ‘If someone offered me the opportunity now to have it under supervised conditions, I think I’d probably take it because your chances are very, very good.’

With no clear guidelines from the Government it is currently down to headteachers and businesses to choose which parents are eligible. 

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said today that employees must ask their bosses if they are indispensable and deserve a school place for their child.

Downing Street has also admitted that while the Department for Education had been working closely with the Office for National Statistics in compiling the list of key workers – they could not yet say how many children would turn up at school next week.  

The key workers list includes binmen, roadworkers, postmen and funeral directors along with police, fire and NHS staff as well as those involved in food production, processing and distribution such as supermarket delivery drivers.

The Government said other key employees were social workers, carers, nursery staff, those working in the justice system, religion and many journalists.

The Armed Forces, prison officers and border staff also make it on to the list along with benefits staff and those involved in the bank and phone industries.  ‘Vital’ civil servants and teachers are also included – as are transport workers in aviation and rail, such as pilots and train drivers, and charity staff supporting people in the community.  

One Nottinghamshire junior school headteacher said today: ‘Pretty much every single job is covered. May as well just stay open!’ One NHS worker told MailOnline: ‘As a GP receptionist, full time mum to a 5 year old dyslexic child, am i a key worker? Who knows based on that list’; Another parent wrote: ‘The government has caused total chaos in schools. Too many questions unanswered’. 

Parents whose jobs are not included must keep their children at home, probably for around six months, Education Secretary Gavin Williamson revealed yesterday.

But Mr Williamson said that pupils who are deemed ‘vulnerable’ will also be expected to stay in school. He also announced that children entitled to free school dinners will be given vouchers or food parcels during the coronavirus outbreak.

He insisted that no child who would usually be eligible for the free meals should go without while their school is closed or they are self-isolating. 

Meanwhile, Number 10’s own experts have warned Boris Johnson’s coronavirus plan could fail and leave the NHS on the brink unless at least half the public obey self-isolation and ‘social distancing’ rules.

The government's chart setting out how it hoped to 'squash' the peak of the coronavirus epidemic so  it does not overwhelm the NHS capacity

The government’s chart setting out how it hoped to ‘squash’ the peak of the coronavirus epidemic so  it does not overwhelm the NHS capacity 

The experts also cast significant doubt on Mr Johnson's claim that the 'tide can be turned' in the crisis within 12 weeks, saying restrictions will be needed for 'at least most of a year'

The experts also cast significant doubt on Mr Johnson’s claim that the ‘tide can be turned’ in the crisis within 12 weeks, saying restrictions will be needed for ‘at least most of a year’

A swathe of newly-released evidence presented to ministers suggests that the fate of the PM’s plan rests on convincing enough people to fall into line.

One paper from the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) dated March 9 says it might be ‘unachievable’ to get 50 per cent of the population to follow measures – including urging everyone to avoid all non-essential social contact and households isolating when one person has symptoms.

It cautions that if the level falls far below that there could be limited effect in protecting the struggling NHS from being overwhelmed.

The documents will increase the pressure on the PM to force bars and pubs to close, saying they are ‘higher risk’ that public events, most of which have already been cancelled.

The experts also cast significant doubt on Mr Johnson’s claim that the ‘tide can be turned’ in the crisis within 12 weeks, saying restrictions will be needed for ‘at least most of a year’.

It comes as Britain’s death toll jumped by 40 in the biggest daily spike yet, with 177 coronavirus patients now known to have died across the UK.

The SAGE papers suggest that Britain will be split into different zones, with ‘hotspots’ such as London and the Midlands facing tougher measures.

Controls could also be eased and tightened depending on the speed of spread, as ministers try to avoid a flurry of cases breaking capacity in the health service.

These would need to be in place for at least most of a year. Under such as policy, at least half of the year would be spent under the stricter social distancing measures.

Addressing the prospects of success of measures on March 9, one SAGE paper said: ‘These interventions assume compliance levels of 50 per cent or more over long periods of time.

‘This may be unachievable in the UK population and uptake of these measures is likely to vary across groups, possibly leading to variation in outbreak intensities across different communities.

‘Overall policy effectiveness of home isolation and whole household isolation shows a linear dependence on the assumed compliance with case isolation.

‘A reduction in compliance of 20 per cent in home isolation and whole household isolation measures, when combined with social distancing for vulnerable groups would only lead to a modest reduction in the effect (around 5 per cent in the peak bed demand and total deaths).’

WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE CORONAVIRUS?

What is the coronavirus? 

A coronavirus is a type of virus which can cause illness in animals and people. Viruses break into cells inside their host and use them to reproduce itself and disrupt the body’s normal functions. Coronaviruses are named after the Latin word ‘corona’, which means crown, because they are encased by a spiked shell which resembles a royal crown.

The coronavirus from Wuhan is one which has never been seen before this outbreak. It has been named SARS-CoV-2 by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The name stands for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2.

Experts say the bug, which has killed around one in 50 patients since the outbreak began in December, is a ‘sister’ of the SARS illness which hit China in 2002, so has been named after it.

The disease that the virus causes has been named COVID-19, which stands for coronavirus disease 2019.

Dr Helena Maier, from the Pirbright Institute, said: ‘Coronaviruses are a family of viruses that infect a wide range of different species including humans, cattle, pigs, chickens, dogs, cats and wild animals. 

‘Until this new coronavirus was identified, there were only six different coronaviruses known to infect humans. Four of these cause a mild common cold-type illness, but since 2002 there has been the emergence of two new coronaviruses that can infect humans and result in more severe disease (Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronaviruses). 

‘Coronaviruses are known to be able to occasionally jump from one species to another and that is what happened in the case of SARS, MERS and the new coronavirus. The animal origin of the new coronavirus is not yet known.’ 

The first human cases were publicly reported from the Chinese city of Wuhan, where approximately 11million people live, after medics first started publicly reporting infections on December 31.

By January 8, 59 suspected cases had been reported and seven people were in critical condition. Tests were developed for the new virus and recorded cases started to surge.

The first person died that week and, by January 16, two were dead and 41 cases were confirmed. The next day, scientists predicted that 1,700 people had become infected, possibly up to 7,000. 

Where does the virus come from?

According to scientists, the virus almost certainly came from bats. Coronaviruses in general tend to originate in animals – the similar SARS and MERS viruses are believed to have originated in civet cats and camels, respectively.

The first cases of COVID-19 came from people visiting or working in a live animal market in Wuhan, which has since been closed down for investigation.

Although the market is officially a seafood market, other dead and living animals were being sold there, including wolf cubs, salamanders, snakes, peacocks, porcupines and camel meat. 

A study by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, published in February 2020 in the scientific journal Nature, found that the genetic make-up virus samples found in patients in China is 96 per cent identical to a coronavirus they found in bats.

However, there were not many bats at the market so scientists say it was likely there was an animal which acted as a middle-man, contracting it from a bat before then transmitting it to a human. It has not yet been confirmed what type of animal this was.

Dr Michael Skinner, a virologist at Imperial College London, was not involved with the research but said: ‘The discovery definitely places the origin of nCoV in bats in China.

‘We still do not know whether another species served as an intermediate host to amplify the virus, and possibly even to bring it to the market, nor what species that host might have been.’  

So far the fatalities are quite low. Why are health experts so worried about it? 

Experts say the international community is concerned about the virus because so little is known about it and it appears to be spreading quickly.

It is similar to SARS, which infected 8,000 people and killed nearly 800 in an outbreak in Asia in 2003, in that it is a type of coronavirus which infects humans’ lungs. It is less deadly than SARS, however, which killed around one in 10 people, compared to approximately one in 50 for COVID-19.

Another reason for concern is that nobody has any immunity to the virus because they’ve never encountered it before. This means it may be able to cause more damage than viruses we come across often, like the flu or common cold.

Speaking at a briefing in January, Oxford University professor, Dr Peter Horby, said: ‘Novel viruses can spread much faster through the population than viruses which circulate all the time because we have no immunity to them.

‘Most seasonal flu viruses have a case fatality rate of less than one in 1,000 people. Here we’re talking about a virus where we don’t understand fully the severity spectrum but it’s possible the case fatality rate could be as high as two per cent.’

If the death rate is truly two per cent, that means two out of every 100 patients who get it will die. 

‘My feeling is it’s lower,’ Dr Horby added. ‘We’re probably missing this iceberg of milder cases. But that’s the current circumstance we’re in.

‘Two per cent case fatality rate is comparable to the Spanish Flu pandemic in 1918 so it is a significant concern globally.’

How does the virus spread?

The illness can spread between people just through coughs and sneezes, making it an extremely contagious infection. And it may also spread even before someone has symptoms.

It is believed to travel in the saliva and even through water in the eyes, therefore close contact, kissing, and sharing cutlery or utensils are all risky. It can also live on surfaces, such as plastic and steel, for up to 72 hours, meaning people can catch it by touching contaminated surfaces.

Originally, people were thought to be catching it from a live animal market in Wuhan city. But cases soon began to emerge in people who had never been there, which forced medics to realise it was spreading from person to person. 

What does the virus do to you? What are the symptoms?

Once someone has caught the COVID-19 virus it may take between two and 14 days, or even longer, for them to show any symptoms – but they may still be contagious during this time.

If and when they do become ill, typical signs include a runny nose, a cough, sore throat and a fever (high temperature). The vast majority of patients will recover from these without any issues, and many will need no medical help at all.

In a small group of patients, who seem mainly to be the elderly or those with long-term illnesses, it can lead to pneumonia. Pneumonia is an infection in which the insides of the lungs swell up and fill with fluid. It makes it increasingly difficult to breathe and, if left untreated, can be fatal and suffocate people.

Figures are showing that young children do not seem to be particularly badly affected by the virus, which they say is peculiar considering their susceptibility to flu, but it is not clear why. 

What have genetic tests revealed about the virus? 

Scientists in China have recorded the genetic sequences of around 19 strains of the virus and released them to experts working around the world. 

This allows others to study them, develop tests and potentially look into treating the illness they cause.   

Examinations have revealed the coronavirus did not change much – changing is known as mutating – much during the early stages of its spread.

However, the director-general of China’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Gao Fu, said the virus was mutating and adapting as it spread through people.

This means efforts to study the virus and to potentially control it may be made extra difficult because the virus might look different every time scientists analyse it.   

More study may be able to reveal whether the virus first infected a small number of people then change and spread from them, or whether there were various versions of the virus coming from animals which have developed separately.

How dangerous is the virus?  

The virus has a death rate of around two per cent. This is a similar death rate to the Spanish Flu outbreak which, in 1918, went on to kill around 50million people.

Experts have been conflicted since the beginning of the outbreak about whether the true number of people who are infected is significantly higher than the official numbers of recorded cases. Some people are expected to have such mild symptoms that they never even realise they are ill unless they’re tested, so only the more serious cases get discovered, making the death toll seem higher than it really is.

However, an investigation into government surveillance in China said it had found no reason to believe this was true.

Dr Bruce Aylward, a World Health Organization official who went on a mission to China, said there was no evidence that figures were only showing the tip of the iceberg, and said recording appeared to be accurate, Stat News reported.

Can the virus be cured? 

The COVID-19 virus cannot be cured and it is proving difficult to contain.

Antibiotics do not work against viruses, so they are out of the question. Antiviral drugs can work, but the process of understanding a virus then developing and producing drugs to treat it would take years and huge amounts of money.

No vaccine exists for the coronavirus yet and it’s not likely one will be developed in time to be of any use in this outbreak, for similar reasons to the above.

The National Institutes of Health in the US, and Baylor University in Waco, Texas, say they are working on a vaccine based on what they know about coronaviruses in general, using information from the SARS outbreak. But this may take a year or more to develop, according to Pharmaceutical Technology.

Currently, governments and health authorities are working to contain the virus and to care for patients who are sick and stop them infecting other people.

People who catch the illness are being quarantined in hospitals, where their symptoms can be treated and they will be away from the uninfected public.

And airports around the world are putting in place screening measures such as having doctors on-site, taking people’s temperatures to check for fevers and using thermal screening to spot those who might be ill (infection causes a raised temperature).

However, it can take weeks for symptoms to appear, so there is only a small likelihood that patients will be spotted up in an airport.

Is this outbreak an epidemic or a pandemic?   

The outbreak was declared a pandemic on March 11. A pandemic is defined by the World Health Organization as the ‘worldwide spread of a new disease’. 

Previously, the UN agency said most cases outside of Hubei had been ‘spillover’ from the epicentre, so the disease wasn’t actually spreading actively around the world.


Source link

About admin

Check Also

Tapestry rises on $2B share buyback, extending failed merger rally

Tapestry (TPR) shares gain on the Coach parent company’s $2 billion share buyback announcement. The …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *