Downcast Queen arrives for church at Sandringham ahead of tomorrow’s royal showdown

The Queen looked downcast as she arrived for church at Sandringham this morning, just a day before she will host crisis talks in a bid to find a solution to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s future roles. 

Dressed in a camel-coloured coat and hat, Her Majesty was seen riding in the back of a chauffeur-driven vehicle, heading to the 16th century St Mary Magdalene Church.

For the first time, the 93-year-old monarch was pictured wearing a hearing aid in her right ear. The type of canal hearing aid is believed to only be for those suffering minor hearing loss.

Among those arriving to the church on foot today was the Princess Royal’s son Peter Phillips, who was pictured chatting to fellow guests.

When Mr Phillips, the Queen’s oldest grandson, was asked how she was bearing up, he responded that she was ‘alright’. 

Ahead of Monday’s Sandringham showdown, William confided in a friend of his sadness that his once close relationship with Harry has soured.

As the feuding siblings prepare to come face to face tomorrow, the Duke of Cambridge said: ‘I’ve put my arm around my brother all our lives and I can’t do that any more – we’re separate entities,’ according to the Sunday Times. 

Royal fans in the 250-strong crowd outside the church also spoke of their support for the Queen and their hopes that ‘a deal’ could be reached with Harry about his future when she holds a meeting with him.

On Monday, Her Majesty will be joined at her private estate by the Prince of Wales and Duke of Cambridge for the crunch talks – where the ‘next steps’ will be decided, after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s bombshell announcement last week.

Charles was in Oman on Sunday to attend a condolence ceremony following the death Sultan Qaboos bin Said al Said, and is expected to travel back to the UK in time for the crisis talks.

The service which was broadcast to the crowd on loudspeakers outside the church began with the traditional singing of the National Anthem, followed by choral prayers which included one for the Queen and for the ‘righteousness’ of her ministers.

Further prayers were said by the Sandringham rector, the rev Canon Jonathan Riviere, for all members of the Royal family, professing the hope that be fortified by the Holy Spirit and ‘enriched with heavenly grace’.

The rector also led prayers for places where there was ‘ so much violence and suffering’, singling out the Middle East and areas of Australia ravaged by bush fires.

Speaking of the passenger jet shot down in Iran, he added: ‘We remember all those who died in the terrible plane disaster. We are praying for all those who died and their families at this time.’

In another prayer which could be taken as wishing for a good result in the Royal negotiations over Harry, he added: ‘We pray for all those who work for peace here and throughout the world.’

He added: ‘We pray for those who are in our thoughts at this time, those for whom we are especially concerned.’

The Bishop of Truro, the Right Rev Philip Mounstephen, gave a sermon comparing the first time that John the Baptist saw Jesus with the expectation of a theatre audience hoping to see a major star, only to find a busker performing when the curtain went up.

The Queen chatted to the Bishop as she emerged from the church after the 50 minute service.

The crowd erupted into a spontaneous round of applause for her as she walked down the porch steps

She smiled before getting back into her car, and then waved as she was driven back to Sandringham House.  

Members of the public gathered to catch a glimpse of the Queen this morning, and gave their views on the royal crisis dubbed ‘Megxit’.

Paula Myhill, 38, who lives near Norwich, was the first to arrive, she said: ‘My view is that if they want to go they don’t get anything – they don’t get money, they don’t get titles.

‘If they don’t want to be part of the royals then they shouldn’t have the titles.

‘If they want to have security then they have to pay for it themselves the same way as a celebrity would.’

Ms Myhill said she feels sorry for the Queen, adding: ‘She’s had a bit of a bad year.’

Her mother, Sue Goodchild, 59, said: ‘She’s been exemplary in her role all her life.’

Ms Goodchild said she thinks the Queen will deal with the family summit ‘systematically’ and added: ‘That’s her grandson. Of course she’s going to protect him whatever she does. She’s a grandma.’ She added: ‘It’s hard for them all. Charles and William.’

Jean Acton, 70, from Fakenham, is queuing to get near the church on the Sandringham estate.

Asked about Harry and Meghan, she said: ‘I think they should give any monies back. You can’t have your cake and eat it.

‘I just think they’ve done the dirty on the Queen.’

Speaking about the Queen, she said: ‘I feel desperately sorry for her. It must be horrible. For any parent. Let alone if you’re a royal or not.’

She described the crisis as a ‘slap in the face’ for the Queen.

It comes as the Duke of Cambridge has said he is unable to even ‘put an arm round’ his younger brother nowadays, after a rift saw them drift apart over the past year.

Harry and Meghan’s intention to quit as senior Royals has widened the gulf between the two siblings, with William understood to be ‘incandescent’ over his brother’s blindsiding of the Family.

But as the brothers gear up to come face-to-face at the Queen’s high-stakes crisis summit at Sandringham on Monday, the second-in-line to the throne confided in a friend his raw agony over the cracked sibling bond. 

William also spoke of his frustration that Harry is no longer part of the ‘team’ by deciding to become ‘financially independent’ in a pared-back Royal role. 

Yet he hopes that there will ‘come a time’ when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be ‘singing from the same page’ once again. 

The Queen, who was pictured ashen-faced behind the wheel of her Land Rover today, is also said to be concerned for the mental fragility of her grandson Harry. 

It also emerged the Duke of Sussex pulled the trigger on his abdication decision because he feared his wife, who had not settled well in the UK, was ‘on the brink’ and could suffer a meltdown if she remained in the country permanently. 

Anxious to avoid exacerbating an already tense situation, the Royal Family is keen to tread carefully. A source said: ‘There is no suggestion that they will be punished or stripped of their Royal titles or HRH status. Everyone wants to find a solution to this as quickly as possible.’ 

After laying down a 72-hour ultimatum to aides on Friday to hammer out a solution to the Sussexes’ future roles, Her Majesty summoned Princes Charles, William and Harry to her Norfolk Estate to put an end to the turmoil ravaging the monarchy – while Meghan is expected to join the discussions via a conference call from Canada.

Courtiers have quickly crashed together a document outlining several blueprints for Harry and Meghan’s new position within the Royal ranks.

Palace staff will also spell out the punitive taxes which could be inflicted on the couple, should they press ahead with their plans to resign from frontline duties.

However, the Sandringham Summit will extend to the ‘next steps’ for the entire monarchy, which is staring down the barrel of its worst crisis since 1992’s Annus Horriblis, when both Charles and Diana, and Andrew and Sarah Ferguson both divorced.  

Commentators have drawn parallels between the New Way Ahead Group – when the senior Royals bunkered down 28 years ago to chart a path out of the chaos – and the Queen’s urgency to stamp out the Sussex situation immediately.

Ahead of the Firm’s unprecedented parley:

• ITV presenter and Sussex confidante Tom Bradby said the couple could give a ‘no-holds-barred’ interview  that could further damage the Royal Family. Courtiers fear Meghan could brand the household racist;
• Royal aides were poised to spell out the punitive taxes that could be inflicted on Harry and Meghan if they press ahead with their plans to quit; 
• A video from July emerged where Harry seemed to tell head of Disney Meghan is interested in doing voiceovers. She has since been given work with the company; 
• Prince Philip was said to be livid with the current crisis ravaging the Family;
• A source rubbished speculation the Sussexes plan to settle down on Vancouver Island where they spent Christmas and instead touted Toronto or LA as potential cities;
• It emerged Meghan sneaked back to Vancouver Island on a £134 budget flight; 
• It was revealed Meghan and Kate Middleton haven’t spoken in over six months after the sisters-in-law severed all communication on a family WhatsApp group 
• Reuters reported that negotiations between Buckingham Palace, Clarence House, Kensington Palace and the Sussex household has been progressing well;
• Her Majesty was pictured stony-faced as she emerged from her Norfolk estate behind the wheel of her Land Rover for the second day running 

Growing up, William and Harry’s brotherly love seemed unbreakable, with the pair supporting each other in the wake of their mother Diana’s death.

As they both developed into their roles as senior members of the Royal Family, they became a somewhat double act who would do engagements together. Even when William married Kate, they would often attend events as a trio.

But during the past year rumours of a brewing row between the brothers began to bubble up, eventually boiling over when Harry and Meghan quit the charitable entity they spearheaded with the Cambridges and branched off to form their own. 

In an ITV documentary earlier this year, Harry refused to deny speculation of the rift and said he and William were on ‘different paths’. 

And it is not just the brothers who have drifted apart, as it was claimed last night that Meghan and Kate Middleton have not spoken in over six months after ceasing communication on their WhatsApp group, according to the Mirror.

The break-up of the so-called Fab Four, which was cemented when the Sussexes left Kensington Palace, weighed on Harry immensely at the time, a source told the Sunday Times.

They said: ‘Harry was very opposed to it at first. He saw it as the opening of a chasm between him and his brother. William was also concerned.’  

But before the break-up, Harry had begun to feel ‘frustrated’ at being told not to take on certain projects or scale them back in favour of his brother, the paper reports. 

To remedy growing tensions, it is believed that Kate was the one who dreamed up the Heads Together mental health charity as a way of of them coming together. 

But the group charity only proved to be a temporary solution, with William now keen to distance the Cambridge camp from the Sussexes as far as possible to limit damage done to the family’s reputation, sources claim.

This may all be strategic, however, as the Sunday Times also reports that the brothers will ‘always be there for each other’ and that their father did envisage Harry and Meghan as part of the new ‘slimmed-down monarchy’. 

As heir to the throne, William’s staff at Kensington Palace have spent the past few days bunkered down in talks aimed at resolving the crisis raging through the Windsor ranks. 

The Duke of Cambridge will weigh in on the ‘Sussex situation’ at the summit where Harry and Meghan will be confronted with the dire financial impact of abandoning the Royal Family at an extraordinary Sandringham summit tomorrow.

Each of the four Royals are expected to be accompanied by their respective private secretaries – Sir Edward Young (Queen), Clive Alderton (Charles), Simon Case (William) and Fiona Mcilwham (Harry). 

Ms Mcilwham, who recently joined the Sussex household from the Foreign Office, is said to have joked with colleagues: ‘I was offered the Iran desk [at the FCO]. That might have been easier’.

Among the sticking points to be thrashed out at the Sandringham summit are whether Harry and Meghan will keep their HRH titles, whether they will continue to perform royal duties abroad, the subject of their funding, and rules regarding commercial deals they hope to strike as they become ‘financially independent’. 

Royal aides and Government officials have drawn up a range of scenarios setting out the ‘stark implications’ faced by Harry and Meghan if they abandon or dramatically scale back their royal duties – including a major tax trap.

In what sources described as a ‘reality check moment’, Harry will travel to Sandringham for a showdown with the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William. Meghan is expected to join by phone from Canada, where she is caring for their eight-month-old son, Archie.

A senior source said a solution that is ‘compatible with taxpayers, compatible with reality and compatible with the Queen’ was being sought.

But the mood is likely to be tense. The Mail on Sunday understands that anger over Harry and Meghan’s defiance of an order not to go public with their so-called ‘abdication’ plan has been compounded by the suggestion – denied by Palace sources – that the couple told Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau about their move before the Queen.

There is also speculation the couple’s close friend Sir Elton John knew about the decision before the Queen.  

Meanwhile, Meghan has been telling friends that a move to North America will be a welcome relief from her ‘toxic’ life in Britain.

Back in the UK, royal sources believe Harry’s ‘stubborn’ nature will mean he will remain determined to see his and Meghan’s split from the family through. 

At tomorrow’s meeting, Prince Harry will be handed documents, compiled following discussions with HMRC and the Canadian tax authority, that will set out in detail the financial penalties for a range of scenarios.

These include a so-called hard Megxit involving a permanent move to North America and a soft Megxit in which the couple split their time between Britain and overseas and retain full, active Royal roles. 

Harry will be told that he would face a potential ‘double tax’ on any commercial income and a large bill for Frogmore Cottage, his home in Windsor, if he and Meghan decide to ditch their royal duties and relocate abroad.

The bill could run into millions of pounds. Canada requires residents – anyone who spends 183 days or more in the country – and some property owners to pay income tax on their global earnings. Similar rules apply in the UK, but the limit is 90 days.

It would mean that Harry might have to give up his UK residency or limit his time in Canada, else risk being double-taxed on any commercial income, paying in both countries. 

Meghan, who is an American citizen, already has to pay tax in the US on any global earnings regardless of where she lives.

The couple may also face hefty charges on any funding they get from Prince Charles’s Duchy of Cornwall estate and could have to pay rent at commercial levels for Frogmore Cottage, which underwent a taxpayer-funded £2.4 million refurbishment before the couple moved in. The couple currently receive annual funding, also of about £2.4 million, mostly from Charles.

There is also genuine concern about the mental fragility of the couple – particularly Harry – so aides are doing all they can to try to ease any transition. 

They understood to have devised plans to offer special arrangements to reduce the couple’s tax liability if they agree to a fuller royal role. 

A royal source last night told The Mail on Sunday: ‘This meeting will give the Duke and Duchess an unvarnished look at the full implications of their choices. 

‘Lots of assumptions have been made about how things can work, but this will be the time for workable decisions to be made in the full knowledge of the consequences and implications, however unappealing.’

Another Palace source said: ‘There are a range of possibilities to review. 

‘Next steps will be agreed at the meeting. The request for this to be resolved at pace is still Her Majesty’s wish. The aim remains days not weeks.’

Wayne Bewick, an expert on the Canadian tax system for the firm Trowbridge, said: ‘Harry’s duties for the Crown could be considered employment income for Canadian purposes.’

In addition to discussion of the Sussex finances, the Sandringham summit will discuss any potential new role for Harry. 

He is already President of the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust, which focuses on projects involving children, but one option might be to extend that role to make it easier to spend time in Canada. 

There was no sign of Meghan yesterday at the £11 million mansion on Vancouver Island where she and Harry finalised their plan to scale back their royal duties over the New Year. 

But in a sign of the couple’s wish to spend considerable time in North America, they have moved their pet dogs to the property. 

Despite the crisis, Palace sources say Harry will honour his commitment to host the draw for the 2021 Rugby League World Cup at Buckingham Palace on Thursday after which he is expected to fly to Canada to be reunited with his wife and son.    

My wife needs a job! Astonishing moment Prince Harry appears to tout Meghan Markle for a Disney voiceover job as he’s seen explaining her credentials to Hollywood mogul Bob Iger at Lion King premiere

By Charlotte Griffiths for the Mail on Sunday and Jack Elsom for MailOnline

Meghan Markle’s voiceover deal with Disney could have been swung by Harry after video footage emerged of the Prince seemingly trying to persuade franchise boss Bob Iger to give his wife a job. 

At the Lion King premiere in London last July, the Duke of Sussex collared the powerful Disney chief and advertised his ex-actress partner’s ‘interest’ in doing voiceover work.

During the hushed conversation, caught on camera by a fan, the Prince gestures to Meghan and says: ‘You do know she does voiceovers?’

Iger can be heard replying: ‘Ah, I did not know that.’ Harry then responds: ‘You seem surprised. She’s really interested.’ The Disney chief then says: ‘We’d love to try. That’s a great idea.’    

It was revealed yesterday by the Times that Meghan has signed a voiceover deal with the Walt Disney Company in exchange for a donation to Elephants Without Borders, a wildlife charity that helps to track and protect the animals from poachers. 

The star-studded premiere last summer raised funds for Harry’s conservation projects in Africa, particularly raising awareness of the dwindling numbers of lions in Kenya.

Alongside a raft of celebrities including Beyoncé and Elton John, the Duke and Duchess attended the event in their capacity as senior Royals, a position they are poised to renounce.

Meghan recorded the voiceover before the royal couple left for their six-week Christmas break to Canada in a £10.7million mansion on Vancouver Island. 

Friends say Meghan is keen to try her hand at directing too, as she wants to keep close ties with the film industry but doesn’t want to have her face on the big screen again just yet. 

Yet branching into voiceovers could be a hint towards how the couple become ‘financially independent’ when they cut ties with the Royal Family.

Experts said becoming a brand ambassador for a global giant such as or Apple could earn the couple tens of millions annually. A nine-figure sum each year – $100million – would add up to $1billion (£760million) over a decade.

The couple have yet to say exactly how they will meet their ambition to ‘become financially independent’. But their unique stellar cachet – blending blue blood and Hollywood royalty – could net them huge amounts.

During tense talks before Christmas, senior members of the royal family accused the pair of already agreeing to a deal with ‘firms including Disney’, according to one report.  

Inside high-stakes negotiations at Sandringham: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will be offered a compromise ‘Commonwealth role’ as courtiers desperately search for a face-saving solution to Megxit – and one aide warns ‘I’ve never seen the monarchy in such a bad state’

By Kate Mansey for the Mail on Sunday 

Sandringham House, near the coast in rural Norfolk, is normally a private sanctuary for the Queen and Prince Philip, a place for family gatherings where they can escape the endless formalities of London and Windsor.

Since Wednesday, however, this Royal retreat has found itself at the heart of the crisis enveloping the Duke and Duchess of Sussex following their shock decision to step back from their official duties and spend more time in North America.

Palace sources say the Queen has demanded a solution be found ‘at pace’ – a sign of real concern in an institution that prefers to operate at glacial speed. But then, as a well-placed source put it: ‘I have never seen the monarchy in such a bad state.’

Behind closed doors, courtiers are desperately searching for a face-saving measure that will keep the family together and the dignity of the monarchy intact. And not only that, for Her Majesty is said to be increasingly concerned for Prince Harry’s mental wellbeing.

After days of meetings, The Mail on Sunday understands that senior courtiers are preparing to offer the Sussexes a compromise deal potentially involving a Commonwealth role. This would allow them to both maintain their HRH status and live in Canada.

Anxious to avoid exacerbating an already tense situation, the Royal Family is keen to tread carefully. A source said: ‘There is no suggestion that they will be punished or stripped of their Royal titles or HRH status. Everyone wants to find a solution to this as quickly as possible.’

All the same, the Palace let it be known that the 93-year-old Queen was ‘hurt’ and ‘disappointed’ by Prince Harry and Meghan’s decision to make their announcement without consulting senior Royals.

Prince Harry had been due to fly back to Canada with wife Meghan on Thursday to be united with their eight-month-old son Archie, but decided to stay on in Britain while a deal is thrashed out.

The Queen has a warm relationship with her grandson so it might seem a surprise that the ‘Megxit’ crisis, as it has been termed, should have been allowed to develop in this way.

In truth, however, tensions have been simmering for months.

It was back in May that Meghan and Harry first made it clear they would like to break away from what they see as the stifling constraints of life inside ‘The Firm’.

A source said that Meghan and Harry found the slow pace of Palace life ‘painful’ and that – in another echo of Brexit – Meghan wanted to ‘take back control’ of her work and charitable endeavours.

To the couple’s dismay, senior Royals were reluctant to discuss their plans with them – so the pair decided to take ‘time out’ with a six-week sabbatical to Canada in November and December.

This decision, too, came as a surprise: the Queen only found out about the break in November when she telephoned Harry to ask if he would be spending Christmas with the family at Sandringham. The answer was no.

Harry asked for a meeting with the Queen at Sandringham when he returned to Britain after Christmas, but it seems aides blocked this until he had ironed out the details of his future plans with his father, Prince Charles. He in turn asked his son to think about it some more and submit a more thorough proposal.

Harry tried again a few days later, and again he was told more time was required to consider the implications, particularly over how the funding would work.

It was made clear he should not make his proposals public until further discussions had taken place – so there was almost no warning at all when the storm broke over Sandringham. The Queen was still hosting the last of the informal gatherings of the festive season, with the decorations still on display (they traditionally remain up until February 6, to mark the anniversary of the death of the Queen’s father, George VI).

Just a few days before, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge had joined her for the Sunday morning service at St Mary Magdalene Church on the estate. Kate’s parents Carole and Michael Middleton were there too, having recently returned from a winter break in St Barts in the Caribbean.

The sermon was given by Rt Rev Vivienne Faull, the Bishop of Bristol, who is believed to have later joined the family for Sunday lunch back in Sandringham’s ornate, green-painted dining room.

But late on Wednesday afternoon the atmosphere of celebration was shattered. A private secretary at Sandringham broke the news to the Queen just ten minutes before the Sussexes’ statement was made public. Her Majesty is thought to have been told of the announcement in a wood-panelled sitting room known as the salon – a room open to visitors who tour Sandringham when it opens to the public every summer.

Despite the traditional setting, the Queen is understood to have read the announcement on an iPad before watching coverage on TV as broadcasters revealed the shock announcement to the country.

Her public response, that there was much more to discuss, was delivered swiftly, as were comments from those inside the palace that senior Royals had been left ‘hurt’ and ‘deeply disappointed’.

It hardly helped that the following day, Thursday, was the Duchess of Cambridge’s 38th birthday.

Not only were courtiers alarmed by the abrupt way in which Harry and Meghan dropped their bombshell, but sources say there is also some bitterness that they were misled for weeks beforehand.

When the Palace first became aware that Harry and Meghan were launching a new website, Sussex Royal – set up by the team behind Meghan’s now defunct lifestyle blog The Tig – they had been reassured that its purpose was to support their charitable foundation.

So when it emerged that it was in fact to be the launch pad for their new independent career, many in the Palace felt that the couple had been disingenuous, or as one source rather more cautiously put it, their behaviour had been ‘suboptimal’. The timing, meanwhile, was terrible. Announcing such news ahead of Brexit and with the monarchy still reeling from the Prince Andrew debacle, not to mention the Duke of Edinburgh’s recent hospital stay, was seen as inconsiderate.

The response has been complicated by senior Royals being dispersed across the country – Charles is at Birkhall, his Scottish retreat in Aberdeenshire, and William was at his home in Kensington Palace.

Meghan has returned to Canada with Harry thought to be staying at Frogmore Cottage in Windsor.

Thankfully for the Queen, she has been able to rely on her 98-year-old husband for support. Prince Philip spends most of his time at Wood Farm, an unassuming cottage on the estate, after retiring from public life in 2017. However, The Mail on Sunday understands he has been staying in the main house since the crisis broke.

Sir Edward Young, the Queen’s private secretary, is overseeing the co-ordination of talks between the different households.

Yesterday aides from the four households of the Queen, the Prince of Wales, William and Harry were locked in talks at Buckingham Palace after earlier meetings involving some of Britain’s most high-ranking civil servants, lawyers and the keeper of the privy purse. The ‘principals’, as courtiers refer to members of the Royal Family, held telephone calls to discuss the options.

The Mail on Sunday understands that Sir Mark Sedwill, head of the Civil Service, has been drawing up plans to offer Harry and Meghan a high profile Commonwealth role, which would allow them to live in Canada and travel abroad on a certain number of official trips each year. Harry is already the president of The Queen’s Commonwealth Trust, last year Meghan was made vice-president – and it is a cause close to the Queen’s heart.

The arrangement could mean that the Sussexes could adopt a ‘George Clooney or Leonardo DiCaprio’ role, said one source, allowing their charitable endeavours to co-exist alongside their commercial interests without clashing.

But the source also pointed out that: ‘a half-in, half-out scenario will be very difficult to pull off’.

On the one hand they will have access to public occasions, such as riding in the carriages at Trooping the Colour and standing on the balcony at Buckingham Palace, but on the other hand they could be seen to be cashing in on their royal status – with a multi-million pound deal for Harry to work with US TV mogul Oprah Winfrey on a series about mental health already announced and an expected book by Meghan sure to be a bestseller.

Palace officials are looking at whether the Sussexes should be required to get Palace authorisation for each commercial deal, although this would undermine the freedom they are seeking.

An insider said: ‘The difficulty will come if they do a deal with a jewellery brand one day and then, on an official engagement, Harry is seen wearing one of the company’s watches. It will be hard to differentiate the two.’

It is hoped that an agreement can be reached by Wednesday.

Perhaps the clues to an imminent crisis were there all along or, at the very least, since Meghan guest-edited the August issue of Vogue. In Meghan’s Editor’s letter – reached by readers after 80-odd glossy pages of adverts for designer clothing and handbags – she quoted a book called The Four-Chambered Heart by Anais Nin, where a character says: ‘I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depth and a great fear of shallow living.’

So was life in The Firm ‘too shallow’ for Meghan? Perhaps cutting ribbons at community centres was never going to satisfy the ambitious young actress who had her engagement ring ‘upgraded’ by adding extra diamonds to the band.

It is suspected that she had no wish, either, to play a supporting role to her sister-in-law, the Duchess of Cambridge.

The Sussexes will look to the example of former US President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle, who, after leaving the White House, launched a lucrative commercial career with multi-million-dollar book deals, a Netflix documentary series and carefully selected public speaking appearances without compromising their ‘brand’. But being a member of the Royal Family is different.

It’s far from clear, for example, exactly what sort of work Harry and Meghan could do without trading on their titles. The Sussex Royal trademark registered with the Intellectual Property Office allows them the right to produce trademarked goods – everything from notebooks to pyjamas.

A source said: ‘The trouble is that there is no precedent for this.’

And when it comes to the monarchy, that is quite a problem.