By Shashwat Awasthi
Feb 21 (Reuters) – London’s FTSE 100 dropped on Friday as investors took measures to reduce their exposure to perceived risky assets as the coronavirus continued to spread, while a buyout offer powered mid-cap real estate investment firm Daejan to a life-high.
The FTSE 100 .FTSE slipped 0.5% after an uptick in new cases of the virus in China and South Korea hit stocks more exposed to commodity prices including oil majors and miners .FTNMX1770.
“Perhaps the reality of the situation is starting to hit home for investors or maybe, and probably more likely, they’re using the slew of warnings to take some profit and risk off the table,” OANDA analyst Craig Erlam said.
The FTSE 250 .FTMCerased earlier losses to trade roughly flat by 0840 GMT, helped by Daejan Holdings DJAN.Lwhich soared as much as 55.7% to match the 8050 pence per share offer price.
The China-linked virus, which has killed more than 2,200 people, dominated headlines again this week and triggered swings in global markets.
Companies including the world’s largest tech firm Apple AAPL.O have warned of a hit to sales due to the health crisis. That has led market participants away from equities and to pile into safe haven assets like gold.
Still, Erlam raised the possibility of a quick rebound in markets as dealers look to buy into assets at a cheap price.
“This is a dip buying environment so it’s probably only a matter of time until investors pile back in on the ‘discount goods’,” he said.
In other moves, education group Pearson PSON.L skidded 4% to the bottom of the blue-chip bourse after its annual profit came in slightly below its forecast.
Shares of Royal Mail RMG.L dipped 1%. The postal group on Thursday proposed a new pay deal to appease its largest union, which has threatened to go on strike.
(Reporting by Shashwat Awasthi in Bengaluru; Editing by Bernard Orr)
((Shashwat.Awasthi@thomsonreuters.com; within UK: +1 646 223 3403; outside UK: +91 80 61822606, +91 80 37962606;))
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Source link