Home / Royal Mail / Prince Harry and Meghan Markle close Sussex Royal Charity

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle close Sussex Royal Charity

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have officially shut down their Sussex Royal charity. 

The couple have filed official paperwork with Companies House to dissolve the royal foundation as they shift their focus to the Prince’s eco-tourism scheme ‘Travalyst’, reports suggest.

The company – which has been set up independently – hopes to help the hard-hit tourism industry survive the coronavirus crisis.

The couple’s move to disband their charitable organisation follows the Queen’s decision that Harry and Meghan can no longer use the word ‘royal’ in their ‘branding’. 

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have officially shut down their Sussex Royal charity, reports suggest

The couple are said to have filed official paperwork with Companies House to dissolve the royal foundation as the couple shift their focus to the Prince's eco-tourism scheme 'Travalyst' (Prince Harry pictured announcing the scheme last year)

The couple are said to have filed official paperwork with Companies House to dissolve the royal foundation as the couple shift their focus to the Prince’s eco-tourism scheme ‘Travalyst’ (Prince Harry pictured announcing the scheme last year)

An insider told Newsweek: ‘Following previous announcements that The Duke and Duchess will not be using the name ‘Sussex Royal’ and will not continue with a foundation in its name, paperwork has been filed with Companies House and the Charity Commission to formally close the charity down.

‘This will appear on the online public record in the coming days. The charity formally enters a period of “solvent liquidation”.’

It is claimed the couple, who quit the royal family earlier this year, want to concentrate on new ventures going forward. 

This includes Travalyst, led by The Duke of Sussex, which brought together some of the biggest operators in the travel industry – including Visa, Booking.com and Skyscanner – to help travellers pick low carbon options more easily and chose destinations that will have more benefit to local communities. 

The couple's move to disband their charitable organisation follows the Queen's decision that Harry and Meghan can no longer use the word 'royal' in their 'branding'

The couple’s move to disband their charitable organisation follows the Queen’s decision that Harry and Meghan can no longer use the word ‘royal’ in their ‘branding’

Harry and Meghan first began using the Sussex Royal branding in 2019, after they split their household from that of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge – known as Kensington Royal. They  set up the charitable organisation called Sussex Royal, The Foundation of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, as well as their website (pictured)

Harry and Meghan first began using the Sussex Royal branding in 2019, after they split their household from that of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge – known as Kensington Royal. They  set up the charitable organisation called Sussex Royal, The Foundation of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, as well as their website (pictured)

Farewell Harry and Meghan: Key dates in the Megxit crisis

January 7: Harry and Meghan return to the UK and visit Canada House in London to thank the country’s high commissioner for the hospitality they received during their six-week stay in Canada over the festive period.

January 8: An exclusive by The Sun newspaper reveals Harry and Meghan plan to move to Canada for a time and are reviewing their royal roles. 

The duke and duchess announce they intend to step back as ‘senior’ members of the royal family. 

The hashtag ‘Megxit’ starts trending on Twitter.

January 9: It emerges Harry and Meghan ignored instructions from the Queen not to make any announcement

The Queen directs all four royal households to find ‘workable solutions’ for the Sussexes within ‘days not weeks’.

January 11: The Queen calls a meeting with Harry, the Prince of Wales and the Duke of Cambridge at Sandringham to discuss the crisis in two days’ time. 

Video footage emerges of Harry highlighting his wife’s interest in doing voiceover work to a Disney boss while on an official engagement at the Lion King premiere.

January 13: Harry faces his grandmother, father and brother at the crisis summit at Sandringham. 

The Queen issues a statement sanctioning Harry and Meghan’s wishes but expressing her regret at their decision. 

She says there will be a period of transition as they spend time in Canada and the UK.

January 14: It is confirmed Meghan, who was planning to take part in the talks via conference call, did not dial in as it was decided it ‘wasn’t necessary’.

January 16: Harry makes his first official appearance since announcing he is quitting as a senior royal, at Buckingham Palace for the Rugby League World Cup 2021 draw.

January 17: Staff at Frogmore Cottage, Harry and Meghan’s home in Windsor Great Park, are to be deployed elsewhere while they are in Canada.

January 18: The summit decisions are revealed – a hard Megxit: The dual role they wanted as working royals is deemed unworkable. 

Buckingham Palace issues a statement saying from spring 2020, Harry and Meghan will no longer be carrying out royals duties and they will not use their HRH styles. 

Harry will lose his military appointments and they will spend the majority of their time in North America and repay the taxpayers’ millions spent on their Berkshire home. 

The deal will be reviewed in 12 months. 

January 19: Harry makes an emotional speech at a Sentebale dinner, telling of his ‘great sadness’ but saying there was ‘no other option’.

January 21: Harry arrives back in Canada to be reunited with Meghan and Archie. The couple issue a legal warning over the publication of paparazzi shots of Meghan walking her dogs on Vancouver Island with Archie in a sling.

January 27: Thomas Markle says he is willing to testify against his daughter as part of her legal action against Associated Newspapers.

February 4: More than three-quarters of Canadians think their country should not foot the Sussexes’ security bill, a survey for the CTV network reveals.

February 6: Harry, accompanied by Meghan, gives a speech at a JP Morgan event in Miami, Florida, and talks about the years of therapy he has had over the death of his mother. Reports suggest Harry could have received a fee worth hundreds of thousands of pounds.

February 14 : It emerges Harry and Meghan are closing their Buckingham Palace office, with up to 15 job losses. 

Meghan releases a video of herself chatting to Vogue editor-in-chief Edward Enninful and putting on party hats in celebration of her guest editing of the magazine last year.

February 19: The Daily Mail reports Harry and Meghan have been banned from using the Sussex Royal brand. 

The Palace issues an update with further details, saying the date of Megxit will be March 31.   

But Harry and Meghan add their own statement to their website, leading commentators to accuse them of taking a swipe at the Queen and other royals. 

The couple claim the monarchy has no ‘jurisdiction’ over the word Royal overseas, that they are being treated differently from other working royals and they will ‘continue to require effective security to protect them and their son’.

February 25: The duke tells a tourism conference host in Edinburgh ‘just call me Harry’ as he returns to the UK for his final round of official royal engagements.

February 27: The Royal Canadian Mounted Police confirms it will stop providing security for the Sussexes once they cease to be senior royals. 

March 3: The Sun reports the Queen has told Harry that he and Meghan would be welcomed back as senior royals if they changed their mind, during a four-hour chat at Windsor Castle.

March 5: Meghan carries out her first public royal duty since the Megxit crisis by attending the Endeavour Fund Awards with Harry. The duke tells how he was ‘proud to serve Queen and country’.

March 6: Images of Meghan’s secret private trip to the National Theatre are released on the couple’s Instagram account – on the same day the Duchess of Cornwall is delivering a key speech on domestic violence.

March 7: Harry, in his last official duty as Captain General of the Royal Marines, and Meghan are given a standing ovation at Mountbatten Music Festival at the Royal Albert Hall.

March 8: The duchess marks International Women’s Day, having earlier visited a school in Dagenham, east London, where she told schoolboys to protect the women in their lives and urged pupils to ‘stand for what is right’.

March 8: The Sussexes join the Queen at church in Windsor.

March 9: Harry and Meghan gather with the Queen, Charles, Camilla, and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge at the Commonwealth Service at Westminster Abbey – their last official engagement as senior royals.

After the travel and tourism industry was hard-hit during the coronavirus crisis, Travalyst now hopes to help rebuild the sector with long-term goals in mind.

Harry and Meghan first began using the Sussex Royal branding in 2019, after they split their household from that of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge – known as Kensington Royal.

In this transition, they set up the charitable organisation: Sussex Royal, The Foundation of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

But after the couple decided to step down as working royals and move to North America, officials made the decision that the Sussex Royal title would still need to be re-evaluated.

 A statement they released at the time struck a more hostile tone in some sections, and said that neither the government nor the Queen herself own the word ‘royal’ internationally – but they would nonetheless stop using the title.

The statement read: ‘While there is not any jurisdiction by The Monarchy or Cabinet Office over the use of the word “Royal” overseas, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex do not intend to use “Sussex Royal” or any iteration of the word “Royal” in any territory (either within the UK or otherwise) when the transition occurs Spring 2020.’

It was revealed this week that Meghan felt ‘unprotected’ by the Royal ‘institution’ because it could not defend her against stories in the press that angered her but were true, sources have claimed.

In papers filed in the High Court, Meghan’s lawyers said press coverage of her while she was pregnant damaged her mental health.

The documents also say she was ‘unprotected by the institution and prohibited from defending herself’.

A source confirmed to The Times that this referred to the team of press officers and wider office staff at the Palace. 

Officials will often refuse to comment to journalists when an on-the-record reply would confirm a story or damage the royal family member involved.

That paper reported one case that had angered the Duchess involved the resignation of her PA Melissa Toubati, who quit in 2018 amid rumours she had been reduced to tears by Meghan’s demands.

The Kensington Palace press team had difficulty in denying the stories, because they were true, The Times said.

‘The stories were a drop in the ocean compared to what was going on,’ another source said.

But Meghan’s legal papers say she ‘become the subject of a large number of false and damaging articles’ in UK newspapers, which caused ‘tremendous emotional distress and damage to her mental health’.  

They add: ‘As her friends had never seen her in this state before, they were rightly concerned for her welfare, specifically as she was pregnant, unprotected by the Institution, and prohibited from defending herself.’

The claims raise the prospect that staff from the Royal Household could be called to give evidence in the High Court, laying bare the inner workings of Kensington Palace.

Meghan is suing MailOnline’s owner Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) over an article in The Mail On Sunday that shared parts of a handwritten note she had sent to her father Thomas Markle in August 2018. She claims publication was a breach of her privacy; the newspaper denies the claim. 

ANL has said Mr Markle shared the letter only after Meghan’s friends – who could be called to give evidence at a possible trial in late 2020 or early 2021 – gave an interview about it to the US magazine People, which he felt vilified him, and he wanted to show it was not the tender message they had suggested.

New legal documents showed that Meghan has now identified the five friends – who spoke anonymously – with the papers just referring to them as A, B, C, D and E, although she named them in a confidential section.

The friends have never been named, with People magazine previously referring to them as ‘Meghan’s inner circle – a longtime friend, a former co-star, a friend from LA, a one-time colleague and a close confidante’.

The five close friends could be called to testify at a trial and be asked if Meghan knew they were speaking to the magazine, something she firmly denies in the documents, which are a response to questions raised by ANL. 

Her lawyers add in the new court filing that Meghan ‘discussed with Friend A that she was writing a letter to her father at the time of penning it’, which was seven months before the article was published in People in February 2019. 

The submissions added that the Duchess and Friend A talked about the existence of the letter, but not its contents, again in September and December 2018, as Mr Markle ‘continued to give interviews to UK media falsely claiming he had not heard from his daughter’. 

Meghan added that she ‘did not know about the interview having been given, and only found out about it, and any reference to the Letter, after the People magazine article was published’.

The Duchess also said that she found out that an article about her was due to appear just before it was published, but she did not know it would be in People or anything about its contents. 

Any court trial is expected to focus on whether Meghan had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of the letter to her father, given that her friends had already briefed People magazine about its contents, and whether publishing parts of the letter was in the public interest and allowed under freedom of expression laws.

Meghan’s legal team said that ‘Friend A’ spoke anonymously to People and made a ‘passing reference to the letter’, adding that the Duchess did not know Friend A gave the interview because she was not involved with it.

Her lawyers add in the new court filing that Meghan ‘discussed with Friend A that she was writing a letter to her father at the time of penning it’, which was seven months before the article was published in People in February 2019.

The submissions added that the Duchess and Friend A talked about the existence of the letter, but not its contents, again in September and December 2018, as Mr Markle ‘continued to give interviews to UK media falsely claiming he had not heard from his daughter’.

Meghan added that she ‘did not know about the interview having been given, and only found out about it, and any reference to the Letter, after the People magazine article was published’.

The Duchess also said that she found out that an article about her was due to appear just before it was published, but she did not know it would be in People or anything about its contents. 

Prince Harry and the Duchess of Sussex are seen with their son Archie in September last year

Prince Harry and the Duchess of Sussex are seen with their son Archie in September last year

Meghan Markle is suing Associated Newspapers Limited over an article in The Mail On Sunday which reproduced parts of a handwritten note she had sent to her father Thomas Markle (pictured together) in August 2018

 Meghan Markle is suing Associated Newspapers Limited over an article in The Mail On Sunday which reproduced parts of a handwritten note she had sent to her father Thomas Markle (pictured together) in August 2018


Source link

About admin

Check Also

Every Post Office branch facing closure – including seven in Yorkshire

The Post Office has issued a warning that up to 115 branches could face closure, …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *