Related Articles
A court has heard that prison segregation is ‘making Tommy Robinson ill’
Tommy Robinson should have his jail term reduced as his prison segregation is ‘making him ill’, the Court of Appeal has heard.
Robinson – whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – was jailed for 18 months the civil offence of contempt of court last October.
The 42-year-old had admitted 10 breaches of a High Court order made in 2021.
The order barred him from repeating false allegations against a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him for libel.
Last month, Robinson failed in a bid to bring a legal claim against the Government over his segregation in prison.
He had claimed he suffered an ‘evident decline in his mental health’ because of his isolation at HMP Woodhill, near Milton Keynes.
READ MORE: The skunk-smoking killer mum who drowned two young sons in bath
Don’t miss the biggest and breaking stories by signing up to the BirminghamLive newsletter here.
On Friday (April 11), his appeal against his sentence was heard at the Court of Appeal.
His barrister Alisdair Williamson KC told the court that Robinson suffers from ADHD and ‘complex post-traumatic stress disorder’.
When combined with his segregation in prison, it is having a ‘demonstrable effect’ on him, Mr Williamson said.
The court also heard that Robinson ‘accepts he has a TV’ while in segregation ‘but complains he cannot watch GB News on it’.
The Solicitor General opposes the appeal, which Robinson attended via videolink from HMP Woodhill.
Mr Williamson said: “Mr Justice Johnson acknowledged that … there could be an effect on Yaxley-Lennon’s mental health and, along with other factors, he reduced the sentence he was going to impose by one sixth, four months.
“But he did not have before him this additional factor, which in of itself means that the conditions that Yaxley-Lennon faces are more onerous.”
He continued: “He is being kept safe by the authorities in segregation, but being kept safe is making him ill, and more ill than Mr Justice Johnson could have foreseen on the basis of the information before him.
“We invite this court to interfere with that order to reduce the sentence imposed.”
Robinson is currently set to be released on July 26.
He was jailed after the Solicitor General issued two contempt claims against him last year.
The first alleged he ‘knowingly’ breached the order on four occasions, including by having ‘published, caused, authorised or procured’ a film called Silenced, which contains the libellous allegations, in May 2023.
The film was pinned to the top of Robinson’s profile on the social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.
He also repeated the claims in three interviews between February and June 2023.
The second claim was issued in August concerning six further breaches, including playing the film at a demonstration in Trafalgar Square in central London last summer.
In October, Mr Justice Johnson said that ‘nobody is above the law’ and described Robinson’s breaches of the injunction as ‘flagrant’.
In written submissions for the hearing on Friday, Aidan Eardley KC, for the Solicitor General, said Robinson’s sentence involved a ‘punitive element’ and a ‘coercive element’.
The ‘coercive element’ – four months – would be deducted from Robinson’s sentence if he ‘were to demonstrate a commitment to comply with the injunction’.
He said Robinson ‘remains defiantly in breach of the order’ and was asking for the court’s ‘indulgence’.
He added in writing that there was ‘no evidence that the conditions in which the appellant is being held are more severe than was anticipated’ by Mr Justice Johnson.
Mr Eardley said: “Legally, there is no basis for arguing that conditions unforeseeably imposed by the prison authorities could found a ground of appeal.”
He continued: “There are no grounds for altering the sentence in this case.
“(Mr Justice Johnson) was fully apprised of the risk that a further period of imprisonment in conditions restricting the appellant’s ability to associate with other prisoners might have a detrimental impact on the appellant’s mental health and determined the sentence accordingly.”
Mr Eardley also told the court that Robinson ‘accepts he has a TV’ while segregated ‘but complains he cannot watch GB News on it’.
Robinson twice held up a sign to the camera, which said a statement from the governor of HMP Woodhill was ‘lies’.
In response, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr said: “We will ignore that, thank you very much indeed.”
The injunction was issued after Robinson was successfully sued by Jamal Hijazi, a then-schoolboy who was assaulted at Almondbury Community School in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, in October 2018.
After a clip of the incident went viral, Robinson made false claims on Facebook.
This included that Mr Hijazi had attacked girls in his school, leading to the libel case.
Mr Justice Nicklin ordered Robinson to pay Mr Hijazi £100,000 in damages and his legal costs, as well as making the injunction preventing Robinson from repeating the allegations.
The Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Edis and Lord Justice Warby will hand down their ruling at a later date.
Source link
